duckspeakWhat this is
duckspeak.news reads mainstream news outlets across the UK, US, and France, and picks apart the framing, euphemism, and unattributed repetition in how they cover the same stories. Not whether a story is true, but how it's told: which word was chosen instead of another, which claim got repeated by four outlets without anyone checking where it came from, which institution that should already know an answer got quoted as "surprised" by it.
The lenses
Two lenses, both from dystopian fiction because both namers turned out to be useful: George Orwell's 1984 for Newspeak (vocabulary built to narrow what's thinkable), doublethink, and euphemism that inverts meaning; Aldous Huxley's Brave New World for distraction over suppression, framing that produces passive acceptance or manufactured urgency rather than outright lies.
Duckspeak
The name is Orwell's own term from 1984: speech produced reflexively, in near-identical framing, without the speaker engaging their own judgment. Applied to news, that's multiple outlets reporting the same claim in near-identical language because they're all relaying one press release or wire line, without independently verifying it, often while omitting that a body which should already know the answer is being quoted as caught off guard by it.
How a critique gets made
Every critique starts from real, current news articles, gets analyzed for these framing patterns, and is drafted with a language model. Every quote or claim in a published piece is tagged with a bracketed number, like [1], that points to a numbered source list built directly from the original article data, not generated by the model, so it always resolves to a real, checkable outlet and link, never an invented one. No critique goes up without a human reading it first.
What this isn't
Not a claim that any outlet is lying, and not a partisan project: outlets across the spectrum, and across three countries, get the same treatment. Where the evidence for a critique is thin, the piece says so rather than overstating it. The point is the mechanism, not the politics of any particular story.
See the privacy policy for what the site does and doesn't collect.