Horse-race framing is the coverage of a political decision as a contest: a battle, a match, a test of unity, a leader who “backed down” or rode a “bounce.” The contest is real enough. Politicians do compete, and readers do want to know who is winning. The problem is substitution. Once the story is told as a race, its natural questions become “who is ahead?” and “who flinched?”, and the questions that would let a reader judge the outcome (what is in the budget, what the deal says, who pays) stop being asked. The race also comes with its own precision: polls, dates and vote shares to the decimal, which make the piece feel factual while the substance stays empty.

The test: strike out every word about winning, losing, fighting or holding together, and see what is left. If the remaining sentences cannot tell the reader what was decided or proposed, the race was the whole story.